- Follow us / Contact us
Newsletter
Subscribe to our scientific newsletter
- Articles suggestions
-
Most popular
- L'information scientifique et technique en libre accès : recherche et veille
- Qu’est ce que la cuisine moléculaire ?
- 9/11 -The collapse of the WTC Twin Towers: the scientific conclusions
- L’évolution de la pratique des réseaux sociaux en science
- Michel Fournier, le grand saut pour bientôt?
- Et si les familles Curie et Joliot-Curie nous parlaient du nucléaire?
- Les Nouveaux Outils Numériques pour la recherche scientifique
- Le projet
- In partnership with
- Our last links
- Born Too Soon: WHO says simple measures would save most premature babies
- L’économie sociale et solidaire : hier aujourd’hui et demain…
- Social Networks for Scientists
- Open Access + Social Media = Competitive Advantage
- Philippe Kourilsky : « FACTS permet de capitaliser l’expérience acquise sur le terrain par les aides humanitaires »
- Les indicateurs de l’évaluation de la recherche : de l’impact factor à l’h-index
- The new digital tools for scientific research
- Les physiciens du CERN détectent une nouvelle particule ‘beauté’
- Join us on Facebook
- our last tweets
Actuality criminology
Find all the articles on this subject.
9/11 -The collapse of the WTC Twin Towers: the scientific conclusions
After the tragic collapse of the Twin Towers on September 11th 2001, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), was commissioned to investigate the failure of the two towers to withstand the hijacked aircrafts’ crashes. The conclusion of their scientific investigation led to modifications of building codes intending to make them more fireproof. Nevertheless, a large group of mechanical engineers and architects from the US contest the scientific results. They ask for a new and independent study of the case and support the conspiracy theory.



